Editors, Readers, and You

Nico (she/her)  
A deep dive into the various editors and readers every novel writer needs—with suggestions for utilizing Critique Circle

Every manuscript requires different editors and readers depending on the stage it’s in and the experience of the writer.

Consider this post your step-by-step guide from start to finish. This is the "traditional/industry-expected order." That said, there are valid reasons to skip/change up pieces. The path to publishing is never one-size-fits-all, and it depends on (1) your goals and (2) your resources, both time and money.

🐉

⭐ Self-Editing

Before you give your draft to a reader, take steps to polish it yourself. This allows your reader to immerse themselves in the story, which results in the best possible feedback for you.

Tips

  • Take a break from your manuscript. Set it in a metaphorical drawer and don’t look at it. When you come back to it later, you’ll see it with fresh eyes.
  • Read it out loud or have software read it to you. This is also great for catching awkward phrases and other errors.
  • Use software to help polish, like Grammarly or ProWritingAid
  • Search for repeated words or phrases.
  • Search for filter words or glue words. Trim them out.

There are mixed feelings among writers about polishing early drafts, because chapters/scenes could still be cut. However, even traditionally-published work has errors that weren’t caught through multiple rounds of edits and proofreading. I’d rather weed out errors early, even if I do cut the scenes later. Regardless of whether or not it “matters” at this stage, addressing the issues makes me a stronger writer and will result in a better experience for my readers and editors.

🐉

⭐ Alpha Read

What It Is

The first reading of the manuscript by someone other than the author, usually in its earliest draft. This process helps craft the story in its initial stages and can lead to major revisions that shape the story.

Reader Focus

  • Initial impressions and big-picture feedback
  • What works? What doesn’t?
  • Storytelling: Is it interesting? Does it make sense?
  • Narrator/Characters: Are they likable? Relatable? Do they seem real?
  • Overall pacing: Does the story as a whole feel too fast, too slow, or just right?
  • Feelings on the book as a whole
  • Do you have any outstanding questions after reading?

Market Cost

$0. These are usually people you know personally: family, friends, colleagues, or fellow writers who you trade work with.

Suggested Quantity

A small, trusted group, typically 3 to 5 readers. They do not need to be in your target demographic, though that’s always preferable.

CC Method 🌌

Premium: Set up a private beta queue with chunks and set a reasonable “read-by deadline” that works for you and your crit partners. The size of each chunk will depend on how much feedback you’re looking for, but generally the chunks are larger (10k+ words) since feedback should be high-level, therefore requiring less words/detail from your crit partners.

Free: Post a chapter consistently each week. In the closing notes for each chapter, ask leading questions related to characters, plot, and worldbuilding. Be specific in the feedback you are looking for. Find consistent crit partners also writing novels who will stick with you---and commit to sticking with them.

Bonus Idea for Alpha-level Feedback: Write a 500-word synopsis and run that through the queue. It will help ensure your overarching story is tight before you continue into the weeds. You need a synopsis anyway if you want to publish traditionally (it's required to query agents), so it’s not “extra work you don’t need to do” — on the contrary, you’ll be ahead of the game and may save time and heartache. The synopsis can highlight problems with the manuscript extremely well, which is why agents ask for it. Even the process of writing the synopsis can help point out glaring issues within a manuscript for you. When you write the synopsis, you have to go in order: A leads to B which leads to C which leads to X, then Y. You can see: are my characters proactive, are their decisions driving the plot, is the plot logical, does the flow work, does this make sense, etc.

🐉

⭐ Beta Read

What It Is

Feedback from the perspective of an average reader within the target audience, pointing out potential issues or areas for improvement. This process helps craft the story in its initial stages and can lead to major revisions that shape the story.

Beta readers are there to provide feedback, not fixes. It's up to you as the author to decide what changes to make based on the feedback, if any.

Reader Focus

  • Book structure
  • Character development/arcs
  • Plot pacing and consistency
  • Setting and worldbuilding
  • Grammar and readability
  • General overall enjoyment and feelings during the read

Market Cost

$30-$45 per hour USD according to the Editorial Freelancers Association.

For $0, you can swap manuscripts with other writers who read within your genre. You also may be able to find readers willing to assist for free through social media like Reddit, Facebook, etc.

Suggested Quantity

A small group, typically 3 to 5 readers, within your target demographic. Ideally, these will be new readers who did not alpha read for you.

CC Method 🌌

Premium: Set up a private beta queue by chapter and set a reasonable “read-by deadline” that works for you and your crit partners. Chapter sizes should be standard to the genre. This allows your beta readers to read at their own pace and provide deeper feedback within the chapters.

Free: Post a chapter consistently each week. In the closing notes for each chapter, ask leading questions related to characters, plot, and worldbuilding. Be specific in the feedback you are looking for. Find consistent crit partners also writing novels who will stick with you---and commit to sticking with them.

🐉

For those aiming to publish traditionally, the process of querying agents should start here: after the beta readers have provided their feedback and the draft has been polished to the best of your ability. After securing an agent, they’d likely work with you on manuscript edits. Then you’d go on submission, where your agent sends your manuscript to acquiring editors at publishing houses. Additional editors will be arranged/paid for by the publishing house if you are successful on sub and are able to sell the manuscript.

🐉

⭐ Developmental Editing

What It Is

The editor will read the entire manuscript and provide actionable advice/feedback to improve the story. Whether or not you implement, it is always up to you as the author. This process can lead to major revisions that shape the story.

Editor Focus

In addition to structure (beginning, middle, end) and the elements of storytelling (inciting incident, build up, climax, resolution), a good editor will look at:

  • Each plot arc and ideas for enhancement
  • Narrative voice, POV, consistency, and ideas for enhancement
  • Character development and missed opportunities to develop the characters further
  • Genre elements/expectations

You may have beta readers who point out these things as well, especially if they are strong readers who read extensively.

Market Cost

$50-60 per hour USD according to the Editorial Freelancers Association. Some provide an editorial letter only, while others offer packages with high-level in-line feedback.

If you happen to find a crit partner who is a professional developmental editor, lucky you. Thank them profusely. Then ask them how they’d like the full manuscript; they probably have a preferred method when working with clients.

Suggested Quantity

Only 1 developmental edit is needed (especially if you’ve done the leg work with your alpha and beta readers). This editor should work extensively with books in your genre. Bonus points if they’ve worked on books you love. Research, ask them questions beforehand, and make sure you know what you’re looking for. They must be a good fit. If you make extensive changes, you may want to have another beta read after you've completed edits.

Traditional publishers: Your agent will likely work with you before the manuscript goes on sub to do a round of developmental edits. Then the acquiring editor or another in-house editor will work with you on further developmental edits. Sometimes, you'll work with other editors as well, depending on everyone's schedules.

🐉

⭐ Sensitivity Reading

What It Is

Sensitivity Readers review unpublished manuscripts with the express purpose of spotting cultural inaccuracies, representation issues, bias, stereotypes, or problematic language. 

Needs vary based on the manuscript. Traditional publishers usually hire freelancers to fill the role.

Market Cost

$40-60 per hour USD according to the Editorial Freelancers Association

If you happen to find a crit partner who can do a sensitivity read for you, thank them profusely. Your needs and theirs will dictate how you’ll work with them.

🐉

⭐ Line Editing

What It Is

A line edit addresses your writing style and language use at the sentence and paragraph level. This edit focuses on the way you use language to communicate your story to the reader.

Editor Focus

  • Is your language clear, fluid, and pleasurable to read?
  • Does it convey a sense of atmosphere, emotion, and tone?
  • Do the words you’ve chosen convey a precise meaning, or are you using broad generalizations and clichés?

Market Cost

$45-60 per hour USD according to the Editorial Freelancers Association. In-line feedback will be provided. Research your editor and consider asking for a sample line-edit of chapter 1/the first 10 pages to make sure they are a good fit for the project.

Suggested Quantity

Only 1 line edit is needed, especially if you've worked closely with beta readers on readability of your text.

Traditional publishers: There may be an in-house line editor, but more and more publishing houses are outsourcing this process to freelancers.

CC Method 🌌

Premium/Free: The public queues truly shine for line edits. Run a chapter a week, and note you are mainly looking for readability, line edits, and word choice in the opening notes. As edits are offered each week, watch for patterns within your work and use the suggestions to edit the next chapter before posting it to the queues. It will help you refine your work further.

As the focus is general readability and word choice within chapters/scenes, it doesn’t necessarily matter if people jump in and out. However, it always helps to have long-term crit partners who are familiar with your style.

🐉

⭐ Copy Editing

What It Is

A copy edit addresses flaws on a technical level. It ensures the writing is in line with industry standards.

Editor Focus

  • Corrects spelling, grammar, punctuation, and syntax
  • Ensures consistency in spelling, hyphenation, numerals, fonts, and capitalization
  • Tracks macro concerns like internal consistency.

Copyediting is that final set of eyes to (1) address any outstanding issues at a line level and (2) ensure a manuscript’s consistency. Copyeditors create a style sheet and review consistency of characters, names, descriptions, and spelling. They may also fact check information.

Market Cost

$40-50 per hour USD according to the Editorial Freelancers Association. In-line feedback will be provided. Research your editor and consider asking for a sample line-edit of chapter 1/the first 10 pages to make sure they are a good fit for the project.

Technical errors immediately make books feel unpolished and unprofessional. If you are self-publishing and can only afford one edit, this is the one I’d recommend specifically because it is that last line-level look and that final polish to make it shine. While the other edits are more subjective, this edit is entirely focused on technical correctness. If your manuscript is highly polished already with minimum errors, some professional copy editors will offer deep discounts—some even cut their cost in half. 

If you are not able to swing the cost, the Chicago Manual of Style is available online to assist you.

Suggested Quantity

Only 1 copy edit is needed. It should be done after the manuscript is entirely complete in its final form. No changes, other than minor proofreading edits, should be done after the copyedit is completed. If you still need to make changes in the manuscript, you are not ready for a copyedit.

Traditional publishers: There may be an in-house copy editor, but more and more publishing houses are outsourcing this process to freelancers.

🐉

In traditional publishing, this is when typesetting will occur. Then ARCs are produced/sent out, often before the final proofreads. If self-publishing, I'd strongly recommend sending ARCs after proofreading.

🐉

⭐ Proofreading

What It Is

This is the final review for any mistakes that might have slipped past all the other editors and readers.

Reader Focus

In addition to spelling, grammar, and punctuation, they review consistency with the layout and typesetting.

Market Cost

$35-45 per hour USD according to the Editorial Freelancers Association. In-line feedback will be provided.

Suggested Quantity

One to two proofreaders are usually enough. However, if you’re able to trade proofreads with fellow writers, more won’t hurt—especially if they can also leave an early review for you.

CC Method 🌌

Premium: Set up a Beta Reading Queue and post the entire manuscript as one entry. The notes should be minimal as all the other edits have been worked through. Readers may not be up-to-date on the latest copy-editing standards, so always confirm an edit is correct before making changes.

🐉

⭐ ARC (Advanced Reader Copy) Readers

An advanced reader copy (ARC) is a pre-published, almost-complete version of a new book. In traditional publishing, it is often a paperback or digital copy that may not have the final proofread or final cover design. Very few (if any) changes will be made after ARCs go out.

Copies are provided to booksellers, librarians, and other purchasers in advance to help them decide if the book is a good fit for their shelves. Copies are also provided to reviewers, bloggers, influencers, etc. These advanced copies allow them to read the book before its publication date so their reviews can coincide with the book's debut. This is also an opportunity to fine-tune the marketing strategy.

Traditional publishers send out ARCs six or more months in advance. While they've definitely commissioned the final cover at this point, it may or may not be ready in time for the ARCs.

If you are self-publishing, aim to send the ARCs out at least two months in advance. There are a lot of other steps involved (a cover, marketing strategy, distribution, etc.), so leave yourself plenty of lead time and figure out what strategy you want to go with for release before sending ARCs. Ideally, your book should already be available for pre-order before you send out the books so that you can capitalize on any buzz generated.

Cost

$0. Never pay for ARC Readers or reviews.

It may make sense to pay for a service to help you find ARC readers or print physical early copies to mail, depending on your situation and genre.

CC Method 🌌

Premium: Set up a Beta Reading Queue and post the entire manuscript as one entry. Let your readers know your preferred sites to post their reviews.

Finding ARC Readers

  • NetGalley. This is the resource most traditional publishers use for eARCs. Cost to go direct for a 6-month listing is $550, but you can use a co-op like Victory Editing or Xpresso Tours for a deep discount and a shorter amount of time.
  • Edelweiss. Not recommended for indie, but it does exist.
  • BookSirens. This space is ideal for the romance genre, but other genres can have success. Cost is only $10 to set up your book plus $2 per reader BookSirens finds for you. There is no cost for readers you find yourself.
  • Booksprout.
  • Voracious Readers Only. The first 20 copies of your first book can be sent for free.
  • Hidden Gems. Needs to be booked well in advance.
  • Reddit. r/ARCreaders is one of the subreddits dedicated to ARCs, but other subs (including the sub for your genre) are worth looking into.
  • Shelf Awareness.
  • Goodreads Review Groups.
  • Social media sites. Plenty of Facebook groups exist dedicated to connecting authors with ARC readers.
  • You can set up a form to collect names and then email eARCs safely using BookFunnel.
  • Book swaps with other authors.


⭐ Good luck, and may the odds be ever in your favor! ⭐



19+ Comments

Stuckinfox

Thanks for the breakdown Nico. I found the list of resources for ARC reviews particularly helpful :smiley: As I know you have experience with both Net Galley and Book Sirens is there one you would recommend over the other?

Jul-01 at 01:51

Nicolaysen

Edit: Just want to kindly remind everyone that no path to publishing is one-size-fits-all and you can always, ALWAYS take what you want and leave behind the rest. :sparkling_heart:

:dragon:

Bonus thoughts:

When working with alpha/beta readers, always set clear expectations, both regarding the reading timeline and your needs from their feedback.

Experience levels vary, so your readers may not know what sort of feedback to provide. It can be really helpful to have a list of questions for them prepared specifically for your manuscript. This prevents disappointment on both sides and ensures you get the feedback you need.

Some good resources for helping you assemble an appropriate list of questions:

:dragon:

This is the complete list of questions I provided to alpha and beta readers for my own first book. I was a brand-new author sharing my work the first time. Having this list really helped me and my readers, half who had never beta-read before and weren’t sure what feedback to provide. If you find it helpful, please feel free to modify it for your own needs. :sparkling_heart:

  • What is your initial reaction to the work (now that you’ve finished)?
  • Did the first chapter make you want to keep reading?
  • Did you skip (or want to skip) any pages? Were there parts you were skimming? Did you get bored anywhere?
  • Did the book feel too long or too short?
  • Were you confused at any point in the story?
  • Did the plot make sense to you?
  • Did anything seem implausible? Too far out there?
  • Do you feel like you know the world? Were there enough sensory details to sweep you away?
  • Do you like CHARACTER 1? CHARACTER 2? (all MCs listed individually)
  • Could you tell the Point of Views apart? Did you know whose portion you were reading?
  • Could you tell the characters apart? Did you lose track of them? Were there too many?
  • Did you relate to the characters?
  • Do you feel the characters’ actions and behaviors were consistent and true to character?
  • Did the conversations and interactions feel authentic?
  • Were you satisfied with the ending? Did you like it? Was it emotionally fulfilling?
  • What parts did you like best?
  • What parts did you dislike/like least?
  • What did you feel was the main theme of the book? Do you feel it was well developed?
  • How would you describe this book? (Bonus: describe the book in one word.)
  • What do you consider comparable titles to the book?
  • Does this book feel self-contained, or would a reader need to read the previous book (or the next book)?
  • Was there anything inappropriate? Something that made you cringe?
  • Anything else you want to share

While my list has a lot of questions, I focused on easy “yes/no” questions that got me the information/confirmations I wanted. I also made sure my readers knew they didn’t have to elaborate heavily if they didn’t feel the answer warranted it. (eg. Did the plot make sense? Yes? Okay, move on.) When they gave me their feedback, I was able to ask follow-up questions or ask for more in-depth responses where needed.

I put all of the answers into a spreadsheet, which allowed for quickly understanding the trends and identifying areas for improvement. All my beta readers answered the questions in writing so it was an easy copy-paste. For my alpha readers, some provided written feedback. For two, we met in person after they read (with wine and cheese as offerings) and I typed their verbal responses into my spreadsheet. The process worked well for me, and the feedback provided was invaluable toward helping me make decisions that shaped the manuscript.

For my second book, I set up a beta read through a private queue on CC. All my beta readers were seasoned, and the book had already been through the public queues. I just said “tell me what you want to tell me” and that was that. This is a firm reminder that (1) one size does not fit all and (2) your methods and plans will change as you grow as a writer.

Jul-01 at 02:22

Nicolaysen

Not really. NetGalley has a far higher quantity of people who use the site, so a higher quantity of “final reviews” on Goodreads came from NetGalley. But the quality of the BookSirens reviews was, I felt, better and more thoughtful. And it allowed people to read a sample first before requesting, which I liked.

Jul-01 at 02:29

Alexmcg

If I was handed a list like that, I’d hand the book back. For me the beta read is someone who reads the genre who will tell me what parts of the book they don’t like. I don’t need the complements, nice as they are.
Asking this many question feels like it is a school assignment.

I ask my beta readers one question. “What don’t you like about the book?” They can mark the spots, maybe even tell me why, though that is less important than the fact they didn’t like it.

Beta reading should be mostly fun, and the parts that aren’t fun should be the places they tell you about.

Jul-01 at 02:33

Alexmcg

I used to be a book reviewer and got a lot of books from Netgalley. They had a couple of things I didn’t like. One was they didn’t follow up on reviews. I tried to read and review quickly, but if I dropped a book, there wasn’t an email reminding me I’d promised a review.

The other thing wasn’t really Netgalley’s fault, but the quality of the blurbs was terrible. Nine out of ten books I rejected after reading the first sentence of the blurb. Essentially, if it wasn’t about the story, I moved on. Way too many blurbs were about the author, or the people who thought the author was great, or people who thought the book was great. I didn’t care about that. I wanted to know about the story. Even if I struggled past that (usually because of the cover) the blurb was too often a recap of the opening of the book.

I don’t have experience with BookSirens. I’d be interested in how they elicited better reviews. Maybe it’s in the screening process.

Jul-01 at 02:44

Deelo316

@Nicolaysen Thanks for your informative and well-organized article.

Jul-01 at 04:10

Nicolaysen

I read NetGalley books all the time. I have nothing but good things to say when it comes to being a user who’s reading books. I find it super easy and really convenient. :sunglasses:

Absolutely your prerogative!

Flexibility is key when working with alpha and beta readers, especially if they’re doing it as a favor. Two of my alpha readers and I (separately, so I could focus on them) had a wine-and-cheese night to discuss the questions/their thoughts on the book rather than writing out, which worked just as well. And two of my alpha readers weren’t into the book 50 pages in, so I told them “Just stop, no worries, not every book is for everyone.” Even people within your target range may not enjoy the book due to writing style or topic or any other number of things.

Writers need to do what’s best for them and what works for them. There is not a single part of the writing-to-publishing process that is one-size-fits-all. :slightly_smiling_face: :sparkling_heart:

Jul-01 at 12:36

Nicolaysen

Glad you found it helpful! :slight_smile:

Jul-01 at 12:36

Nsnicholas

What a fantastic post, @Nicolaysen - I love how this is broken down. Great job!!

I can add that, as a beta reader for many published novels now, it also taught me a great deal as a writer! I encourage everyone to participate as a beta reader at least once.

-NSN

Jul-01 at 15:14

Nicolaysen

I wholly agree with this.

Related — Last year, I started annotating popular published works specifically looking at these elements (plot, characters, world) and how they play together. It’s been incredibly eye-opening and helped my writing a lot as well.

Jul-01 at 16:39

Alhambra

Thank you for the great summary!

Jul-01 at 17:20

Vidyut

Nice. Maybe I should read it again before publishing book 2. :rofl:

Jul-01 at 17:54

Nicolaysen

I’m glad you found it helpful :slight_smile:

Can’t hurt :rofl: :sparkling_heart:

Jul-01 at 20:03

Vidyut

Never mind.

Jul-01 at 20:12

Nicolaysen

If someone is looking for an editor, I have a list of editors I’ve worked with who charge reasonable prices. One of my favorites is a dorky, awkward human (like me! No shade) who plans edits/his calendar around Comic-cons :rofl: Another editor I really like used to work at Tor. They’re amazing for developmental feedback.

Trade Secret: Most freelance editors will happily read/edit your first 5k words specifically to make sure the manuscript is something they want to take on. If you’re handing them a manuscript with major typos or major structural problems, seeing your first 5k words will alert them to that—and potentially “save them” from a project that would be a slog for them.

Additionally, the EFA has an amazing directory of editors that allows you to filter down to exactly what you are looking for: Member Directory - Editorial Freelancers Association (the-efa.org)

Jul-01 at 20:49

Nicolaysen

Your readers telling you what they like is not just a “pat on the back” or a compliment for you. It’s actually important information for you as a writer, because when you go to make edits, those are the elements you (1) don’t want to change or (2) may even want to ramp up.

Jul-01 at 21:05

Vidyut

I’m stuck somewhere between you and @Alexmcg on this. Knowing what the readers think is important. Equally, when I do crits/betas, I pretty much comment what jumps out to me and I can be such a nit-picker that if there is a problem I see, trust me, I won’t wait for you to ask about it. I often don’t get what people want to know with such lists. I answer what makes sense, but it is very rare to run into a question I have an unvoiced opinion on. (Edit: Opinion worth acting on, that is, or ticking off as very good)

For betas of my own work, I just ask generic stuff that will get the reader talking (what did you like/dislike, if this were your book, what would you change), and I listen to what they’re talking about. If it sounds about right or better, we’re done. If not, I’ll ask questions specific to the mismatch between my expectations of the feedback and the reality.

But then in many ways, I’m an over-confident writer. I never ask whether characters are landiing, for example. I wouldn’t send the betas out if they weren’t. If there are issues with the plot/logic/continuity, readers flag them anyway. So there doesn’t remain a whole lot of book-breaking stuff left to ask about. In betas, I mostly am listening for whether they sound happy at the other end and excited about the story or excited that it is finally over. I want them to have some moments that remain in their mind with a good degree of specific detail, but am not picky about which ones.

I listen for what moments stand out for the reader, which characters win hearts. For example, my MC is Ax, but consistently, Am is the one who gets mentioned more. This is worth noting, so I can adjust the next book to take that effect forward. But I’ve written my characters. I wouldn’t alter Ax because MC should be noticed more or something.

Worth adding: Hasn’t happened to me so far, but if I got lukewarm feedback, I’d take the book back to the edits. I’ll take something pissing readers off, touching them profoundly, whatever. But everything’s fine without anything standing out much is actually not fine. It hasn’t happened, but if it does, I’ll consider the book to be a fail, not a pass.

Jul-01 at 21:15

Nicolaysen

With my second book, for my beta readers, I straight-up said “tell me what you want to tell me.” It had already been through the public queues, it was where I wanted it to be in terms of the arcs and characters, and I was mainly focused on the last polish and wanting to know things that stood out. I ended up rewriting/editing 5 scenes of the book based on beta reader feedback, and I cleaned up some sentences and word choices. Then it was off to the copyeditor. :+1:

Can’t stress enough, there is no one-size-fits-all :sparkling_heart:

Jul-01 at 21:25

Alexmcg

True, but mostly they are things I’m not going to touch. The story is like baking a cake, someone may like the sweetness, but ramping it up could ruin the cake.

Jul-01 at 22:03
Click here to reply
Member submitted content is © individual members.
Other material ©2003-2024 critiquecircle.com